No. 24-5544
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: autopsy-report confrontation-clause crawford-standard criminal-procedure homicide-investigation testimonial-evidence
Latest Conference:
2024-12-06
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether a certified autopsy report—created as part of a homicide investigation and asserting that the cause of death was homicide—is "testimonial" under the Confrontation Clause framework established in Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004)?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a certified autopsy report created as part of a homicide investigation is 'testimonial' under the Confrontation Clause framework established in Crawford v. Washington
Docket Entries
2024-12-09
Petition DENIED.
2024-12-03
Reply of petitioner Evan Wald filed. (Distributed)
2024-11-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/6/2024.
2024-11-06
Brief of New York in opposition submitted.
2024-11-06
Brief of respondent New York in opposition filed.
2024-10-07
Response Requested. (Due November 6, 2024)
2024-10-03
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/18/2024.
2024-09-30
Waiver of right of respondent New York to respond filed.
2024-09-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 15, 2024)
2024-08-18
Application (24A172) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until September 18, 2024.
2024-08-09
Application (24A172) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from August 19, 2024 to September 18, 2024, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.
Attorneys
Evan Wald
Jan Hoth — Center for Appel. Litigation, Petitioner
New York
Steven Chiajon Wu — New York County District Attorney's Office, Respondent