No. 24-5535
Cesar Yoaldo Castillo v. United States
Tags: circuit-split criminal-statute federal-assault sentencing-enhancement statutory-interpretation violent-crime
Latest Conference:
2025-01-10
Question Presented (from Petition)
If a VICAR assault is predicated on an underlying state or federal assault offense that does not satisfy 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)'s "crime of violence" definition, can the VICAR assault still qualify as a "crime of violence" under that same definition?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a VICAR assault can qualify as a 'crime of violence' if the underlying assault does not satisfy 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)'s definition
Docket Entries
2025-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2024-12-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2025.
2024-11-14
Brief of respondent United States filed.
2024-11-14
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2024-10-11
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 14, 2024.
2024-10-10
Motion of United States for an extension of time submitted.
2024-10-10
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 15, 2024 to November 14, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2024-09-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 15, 2024)
2024-07-15
Application (24A31) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until September 9, 2024.
2024-07-09
Application (24A31) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from July 25, 2024 to September 9, 2024, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Attorneys
Cesar Yoaldo Castillo
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent