No. 24-5530
Manuel Larry Jackson v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure due-process evidence-preclusion fifth-amendment percipient-witness sixth-amendment
Latest Conference:
2024-10-11
Question Presented (from Petition)
Do the Fifth and Sixth Amendments guarantee a defendant the right to call a percipient witness to nearly the entirety of the Government's evidence presented in the prosecution's case-in-chief, or may a district court preclude such percipient witness testimony as irrelevant?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Do the Fifth and Sixth Amendments guarantee a defendant the right to call a percipient witness to nearly the entirety of the Government's evidence presented in the prosecution's case-in-chief, or may a district court preclude such percipient witness testimony as irrelevant?
Docket Entries
2024-10-15
Petition DENIED.
2024-09-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2024.
2024-09-17
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2024-09-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 15, 2024)
Attorneys
Manny Jackson
Ethan Atticus Balogh — Balogh & Co. APC, Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent