No. 24-5481
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure eighth-amendment federal-sentencing judicial-review proportionality sentencing-guidelines
Latest Conference:
2024-10-11
Question Presented (from Petition)
Did the sentence of three hundred months violate the grossly disproportionate protection afforded by the unusual sentence prohibition under the Eighth Amendment because United States Sentencing guideline 2G2.2 was not the product of the institutional role of the United States Sentencing Commission?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a 300-month sentence for a federal offense violates the Eighth Amendment's prohibition on grossly disproportionate sentences due to potential procedural flaws in United States Sentencing Guideline 2G2.2
Docket Entries
2024-10-15
Petition DENIED.
2024-09-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2024.
2024-09-16
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-09-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due October 7, 2024)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent