I. Does Evidence That was in the STATE'S Possession: An Affidavit Signed by The PROSECUTOR: Recorded Evidence in Doctor's Note; And Transcripts from Preliminary hearing, THAT WAS Known About before Trial, but not presented AT Trial which shows the STATE Elicited false and Prejudiced testimony PERTAINING to the Removal of Consent, Should the state Failed to Correct the fake testimony, and TRIAL attorney Failed to Contest THE False Evidence meet the Standard of Brady, Giglio, Miscarriage of Justice or the Actual Innocence Clause Way to Excuse Grounds One, Two, And THREE?

II. On THE RESPONDENT'S Motion in Federal Court for the 2254 Ground One, the STATE Knowingly failed to Correct false and Perjured testimony by the Alleged Victim is Procedurally Defaulted, When the Respondent Argued 28 U.S.C. Section 2254 the "Cause And Prejudice" EXCEPTION, Excusing the Ground, 2021 Missouri STATE Court Proceeding?

III. Can APPELLATE ATTORNEY'S Ineffectiveness in raising a claim specifically prosecutorial misconduct that concerns Knowing failure to Correct false and Perjured testimony in Memo Respect with AEDPA Exception of Cause And the judge Excusing Ground ONE?

IV. Is Post-Conviction Ineffective Counsel for Failing to Raise claims Against Trial Attorney, For Failing to OBJECT/Impeach Perjured and False testimony of the Alleged Victims specifically the Removal of Consent And Actions Against the Petitioner, which should have been Raised in the Initial Review Collateral Proceeding BY THE Exception under Martinez V. Ryan?

Whether the prosecution's failure to disclose exculpatory evidence violated the respondent's due process rights and constitutional protections