QUESTION ONE. IF TRIAL COUNSEL FAILS TO, AND REFUSES A DEFENDANTS REPEATED DEMANDS TO FILE A MOTION TO SUPPRESS AND MAKE THE PROPER FOURTH AMENDMENT CLAIMS WHEN AN ALARMING AMOUNT OF FOURTH AMENDMENT ISSUES CLEARLY EXIST, IS THAT INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE UNDER STRICKLAND AND A VIOLATION OF U.S. CONST. AMEND.'S SIX & XIV?

QUESTION TWO. IF TRIAL COUNSEL FAILS TO MOVE FOR JOA WHEN THE STATES EVIDENCE ON A KEY ELEMENT OF THE OFFENSE IS INSUFFICIENT TO PROVE GUILT, AND COUNSEL IS NOT AWARE OF NOR RESEARCHES, AND THEREFORE FAILS TO APPRISE THE TRIAL COURT OF A RELEVANT LAW THAT WOULD HAVE SUPPORTED A JOA ARGUMENT AS TO THE OFFENSE IN QUESTION, IS THAT INEFFECTIVE UNDER STRICKLAND AND A VIOLATION OF U.S. CONST. AMEND.'S SIX & XIV?

QUESTION THREE. IF TRIAL COUNSEL MOVES FOR JOA ON AN OFFENSE, BUT FAILS TO ARGUE THAT THE STATES EVIDENCE ON A KEY ELEMENT OF THE OFFENSE WAS INSUFFICIENT TO PROVE GUILT, IS THAT INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE UNDER STRICKLAND AND A VIOLATION OF U.S. CONST. AMENDS SIX & XIV?

QUESTION FOUR. IF TRIAL COUNSEL FAILS TO OBJECT TO "PURE OPINION" TESTIMONY THAT CLEARLY INVADES THE PROVINCE OF THE JURY, IS THAT INEFFECTIVE UNDER STRICKLAND AND A VIOLATION OF U.S. CONST. AMENDS SIX & XIV?

Whether Texas counsel fails to adequately challenge insufficient evidence and provide ineffective assistance of counsel in violation of U.S. Constitutional rights