Karl D. Drew v. Stephen Smith, Acting Warden, et al.
L),£}o-e_& R>XfT7ovn-$_R , -/-/-£) v-e_~tf-j 7o (o-e_ Pi^Rol^-b, isJ-N-ej^n
Xl /_^k/ ejsn&ilS;*bsn£) STAT-e^ P&F&I jl. P,
0. t-Po€_S F^jsi < (10tO£_^i PW\/€ — "TP- P Qy\rT^~ ~To l /fQV-e_ '&f f~flS> C>l/) ,
XuiX^Jb 77e_ M^-R iT ?{
,). [A)rft4T ComSTtlXJT/oinrt/ pRoTt&Iotsi &c^lS-ft 77^-e- Cft/cXftA
SA julT /-/ftv*-., 77e/^e_S ftf /qkj 7^/$M <£>*47< j
KA^hciKyiv^ I 7^^ <h>ATe-^
'). vDc3€_S> -X Lfio-efCry ( SS(j-X (oe-COM-e — fX/XiO-evX ;beJ-oRe —, 0>R
tfRTcR. ~TU*_ &AT4- f P>^S P^SSe/xf
>), £>o PXiXom-^R, Pf^v-e_ CO\n£TiT<JTfO\nrtl P^-ftTS /f}-^ £> Coio^77
-~Uc\r\{\l< PRoTejzTiom?,
), Poeii PeX/Xo^-^-R , GiftRC*-RATto to CoP/o7ft £- MtTXfMUV? <brtfe
y/iolATe^ TtT?-. Cown-^T)7oto ft}M€ a/X> k^-SL iTT <2~^ ?
\ F)o ft}- F^jsi&lc&'iCrtl SytSj -zasj -f4ft\/-% — ~(-trl-z-. RtQA-(1 To -f-folJG) -ft*o ftft^-eftyCf^
Ci77'zi-ejun to^Yo^X> ft}- Mi^FxifK/iVM <Dft7«_ l^JWr-ioGT -ftwy' Ce>'oSeqO«-i^nc_e_? (
). C-Avi ft¥ FXvnoloGHCft}{ SYSTEM AoiR> -ftft} ftW?-e.R/c.ft}vn cJTi z.e^o , toeYo^
■A /vj^VXiiwiuM £>v47Y_ i/OiTMouT ft}- TTuSTroR. Vv^li-D CftkjS-eR
Does a forensic system that prevents an American citizen from challenging their maximum state without attenuator violate constitutional protections