Did the District Court and Appeals Court committed reversible error, abuse of discretion, and error as a matter of law and did not enforce the statutes and enforce the statutes that were enacted by congress the were violated by Defendant/Appellee because Plaintiff/Appellant is pro se, black, in a protected class and indigent?

Is Defendant/Appellee barred from contesting on appeal the facts thus established by Defendant/Appellee willful default.

Did Plaintiff/Appellant case receive the judicial attention which Article III of the Constitution requires?

The record proves Defendant/Appellee "Chase " business records were not attached to the Affidavit of Dorothy A. Washington. Can Defendant/Appellee be granted Summary Judgement?

The District Court stated, Plaintiff/Appellant Attempted Wrongful Foreclosure may proceed. See Doc. 171 Pages 10 -14 of 28, C Attempted Wrongful Foreclosure, Page 14, para 5-6, "All told, the allegations in the amended complaint are sufficient to state a claim for attempted wrongful foreclosure, in Case #1:18-cv-5542-SDG-CCB. Can the case be dismissed and not proceed to trial on damages?

The record proves that Managing Partner, Attorney William O. Tate is a debt collection and mostly works from home and travels a lot and do not have no meaningful involvement in the cases for his client, "Chase ", (applying the meaningful attorney involvement doctrine. Can a debt collector that do not have no meaningful attorney involvement litigate a case in Federal Court?

If Genuine issues of material fact remained which barred a grant of summary Judgement in favor of Defendant/Appellee, can the Court dismiss the Case?

Whether the District Court and Appeals Court committed reversible error and abuse of discretion in a pro se civil rights case involving alleged statutory violations and potential wrongful foreclosure