Mario Chavez v. Carlos Lazarin, Warden, et al.
CWc\ dee^ved \V ^nx.&£M *Vo " Woo/e, W avooVWercicty (Mx{
^Ejcjt\ V ^©V\ wJdt gk (xw^reWstve <taW-XA\'cyv. oV'WW aac>uac\\ ,
ydW^A- vV dW'f (AAdvA.^ \/\ CVcuo^o^d -Vo wA<\ke. <x Coux^e- Q^uStM'&AJfc
Vj^rmAswdoA Clause. ^ns^udwe- W -VUa \m)fe iVs
(V^CfcsCcA- (j^OTA^ OXvfO'S.'S 'VWe \A.c*JfcOC>A\ So-VV\ ^^5.
WwvV ^Ltv'OAvV \ Vo^e cViafVei di%re»^ (wr^es \w
^Yew v vl > OuOt'^V^^A; Q^eA^ewOcs sacU as ^kc4^
o^\nx\KC^ are AssYMsWal W awiAAcOeke^ CoA^cMc^tib^ Clause
Q^.«30A^gd Vw Y(yAv Ac^ad'H-ext- TWe.e.
av-e i olV Wsa \ clwc\ , V Cj-owreiml )
(feu^'iv^srl^ji'd^e \o \V& ^w)Ji vjJwd^A^pv'sU^ q,ws3l \Y£$ (ovjutV's.
r\x\U^ \Vskk vl W\)V aq| AW y^oAoAa ouOv'C^-a^aH s^i©iM-€^
*W 'VW Wi -e\j i%e v»y&v\)A V^wdtesr Yw L©/\l^o^3f)dX0A
^rwoeySess -\p «\mj/v» % vtao^v W^VVonal
^caaxdtes ViViOivj Vs, ^r^tcsW| vOViyM/vYs &uH \\ ardjW Y>
N^kij<v\vv av4. sqAW We cMs^ie H* caw a cr\Aii^V d^BAAd^Jt
hVW ©jO^V^urt <3Ccus>adj!o/v cY a v\$n-
ca^cvvsk/vfc \\ Aw W'bi Cfeurt "fe
V aw ^>wWd vJdA-eaxYvc* ?i n
OA
Whether a criminal defendant's Sixth Amendment confrontation rights are violated when a court admits hearsay evidence through a surrogate witness in violation of the Confrontation Clause