No. 24-5411

Mario Chavez v. Carlos Lazarin, Warden, et al.

Lower Court: Tenth Circuit
Docketed: 2024-08-28
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: confrontation-clause constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process hearsay-evidence sixth-amendment
Latest Conference: 2024-10-11
Question Presented (from Petition)

CWc\ dee^ved \V ^nx.&£M *Vo " Woo/e, W avooVWercicty (Mx{
^Ejcjt\ V ^©V\ wJdt gk (xw^reWstve <taW-XA\'cyv. oV'WW aac>uac\\ ,
ydW^A- vV dW'f (AAdvA.^ \/\ CVcuo^o^d -Vo wA<\ke. <x Coux^e- Q^uStM'&AJfc
Vj^rmAswdoA Clause. ^ns^udwe- W -VUa \m)fe iVs
(V^CfcsCcA- (j^OTA^ OXvfO'S.'S 'VWe \A.c*JfcOC>A\ So-VV\ ^^5.
WwvV ^Ltv'OAvV \ Vo^e cViafVei di%re»^ (wr^es \w
^Yew v vl > OuOt'^V^^A; Q^eA^ewOcs sacU as ^kc4^
o^\nx\KC^ are AssYMsWal W awiAAcOeke^ CoA^cMc^tib^ Clause
Q^.«30A^gd Vw Y(yAv Ac^ad'H-ext- TWe.e.
av-e i olV Wsa \ clwc\ , V Cj-owreiml )
(feu^'iv^srl^ji'd^e \o \V& ^w)Ji vjJwd^A^pv'sU^ q,ws3l \Y£$ (ovjutV's.
r\x\U^ \Vskk vl W\)V aq| AW y^oAoAa ouOv'C^-a^aH s^i©iM-€^
*W 'VW Wi -e\j i%e v»y&v\)A V^wdtesr Yw L©/\l^o^3f)dX0A
^rwoeySess -\p «\mj/v» % vtao^v W^VVonal
^caaxdtes ViViOivj Vs, ^r^tcsW| vOViyM/vYs &uH \\ ardjW Y>
N^kij<v\vv av4. sqAW We cMs^ie H* caw a cr\Aii^V d^BAAd^Jt
hVW ©jO^V^urt <3Ccus>adj!o/v cY a v\$n-
ca^cvvsk/vfc \\ Aw W'bi Cfeurt "fe
V aw ^>wWd vJdA-eaxYvc* ?i n
OA

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a criminal defendant's Sixth Amendment confrontation rights are violated when a court admits hearsay evidence through a surrogate witness in violation of the Confrontation Clause

Docket Entries

2024-10-15
Petition DENIED.
2024-09-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2024.
2024-09-16
Waiver of right of respondent Lazarin, Warden, et al. to respond filed.
2024-08-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 27, 2024)

Attorneys

Lazarin, Warden, et al.
Jane Alissa BernsteinNew Mexico Attorney General, Respondent
Mario Chavez
Mario Chavez — Petitioner