1. Whether the Court of Appeals erred when it determined that petitioner's Eighth Amendment claim of deliberate indifference against a federal corrections officer, present for Bivens purposes, a new context

2. Whether the Court of Appeals erred when it affirmed the district court's grant of summary judgement to the federal corrections officer and dismissed the petitioner's complaint.

Whether the Court of Appeals correctly applied the Bivens doctrine in evaluating an Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference claim against a federal corrections officer