No. 24-5402

Craig Foote v. United States

Lower Court: Third Circuit
Docketed: 2024-08-27
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: counsel criminal-procedure ineffective-assistance sixth-amendment
Latest Conference: 2025-01-10 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Was Petitioner denied the effective assistance of counsel?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the petitioner was denied effective assistance of counsel

Docket Entries

2025-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2024-12-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2025.
2024-12-09
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2024-11-13
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including December 9, 2024.
2024-11-12
Motion of United States for an extension of time submitted.
2024-11-12
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 18, 2024 to December 9, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2024-10-11
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 18, 2024.
2024-10-10
Motion of United States for an extension of time submitted.
2024-10-10
Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 17, 2024 to November 18, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2024-09-17
Response Requested. (Due October 17, 2024)
2024-09-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-09-06
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2024-09-06
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-08-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 26, 2024)

Attorneys

Craig Foote
Salvatore C. Adamo — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent