UMV«6^v {AtAoitl , fekrkext" eu% o
ask -VWs (Lec^-Vtb r^uieM) -H^e- de,di^io^ ©k fVk /e^ped-'&d l\
e 'AeitcLS Cou^k" Of
Cv'T'wkect A^pecxk c)^wicc\ e>k diak Hckecu^ Corpus /ko^
^C.i fJ®' U)fc- , So Cj- £ l-; bJ^Vkouk to fitter
fe$e^Wa.r^ 'Q-oLcJruAil tkk r^rik^aPPcjrkW
J\K a^ck J- T«. Cri-u f~c. A,^- 1101"TV v€^ Oy^CXctMJs ^
bi^kke_ (X_^ erv
^ kc^tO• fVWioAer oSs^ ^ kts ^ ^roUe/ - ,
UosW^r Coim^ ^uJq^ujW is aksekrieiJ-s uoUM/^ ICW n^T
do^i: ^uJ<^_,O lvvc) Ki| dou^f ^|>p<9i^ke<^douA&iJL +irvcd t>ot
_S>WovUc) WotfaLu^eJ fWy^6e_|i

• jkkikjexAe^u e~£
| IS isknckN^uJc^e f e-'fksaA k> f uAe_
f^eko ^ -To U\kWc)ra^o f ka (bulvlk, k\kJ /\uck^ ;
OQS , Uvc9 lakes Vd S pDOorke^yd-k (Xo^ e</yy it\ e <r\k ^
froceS S* kkWers3^r W^ce_ CoWcW ^aucn^O^ ©£(WW I

» (kkikitf^er CL^k +VtS C_ouuri jo T^OieJ ~fW [nJ/cjrn) e*rf, UJkere.
-\ We. ^arf\k C_pck kkcu^^'e r ujq^ U-S>£-^ as> ejrvVvou'vcer^ e^fk
ko^vcL^ c^s cA^-oorl^ skourrv

« fekiW^^er ex\\e_^es Ek<\VkK Uiolakltfi^ u)k^e_
ok Ukt\e.cur^ ok ao^ i a_ 3^ tyL*-r ^ e^kevLCe c_le_a^l^ outtae^ks
■VW^-W olV^W^ ok OY-xc^kt ok OL.We.^eJ ul b ^ kuAxe-^ 4c^rcx/ws

. Pe-tWey aA Hv« C

Whether the Court of Criminal Appeals erred in denying habeas corpus relief where potentially exculpatory evidence was withheld and the petitioner's constitutional rights may have been violated