Nathan Brooks Manuelito v. United States
Whether statements made, in part, to provide evidence for a criminal prosecution can satisfy the hearsay exception in Federal Rule of Evidence 803(4) for statements made for medical treatment, or whether such a dual-purpose analysis conflicts with the rationale of Rule 803(4) and this Court's caselaw on ensuring the reliability of admitted evidence?
Whether statements made, in part, to provide evidence for a criminal prosecution can satisfy the hearsay exception in Federal Rule of Evidence 803(4) for statements made for medical treatment, or whether such a dual-purpose analysis conflicts with the rationale of Rule 803(4) and this Court's caselaw on ensuring the reliability of admitted evidence?