No. 24-5375
Michael Antrantrino Lee v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-law criminal-law due-process retroactive-application sentencing-guidelines supreme-court-interpretation
Latest Conference:
2024-09-30
Question Presented (from Petition)
0. Is the decision in U.S. v. K 3d 232, 235-3.^ (11th Cir. I retroactively applicable?
2). Does mitigation arguments list be warranted guidelines Viol Act type pseudo concerns articulated by the Supreme Court (the Court, at 1SS* S. Ct. 2EST)?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does retroactive application of sentencing guidelines violate due process as construed by the Supreme Court?
Docket Entries
2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-09-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-09-06
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2024-09-06
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-08-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 23, 2024)
Attorneys
Michael Lee
Michael Antrantrino Lee — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent