No. 24-5371
IFP
Tags: aedpa-constitutionality appellate-procedure habeas-corpus judicial-review plea-agreement subject-matter-jurisdiction
Latest Conference:
2024-09-30
Question Presented (from Petition)
I. Is the Anti-Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA) still Constitutional after this Courts ruling in Jones v. Hendrixs?
II. If subject matter jurisdiction can never be waived or forfeited, how is the AEDPA still constitutional if it blocks any other vehicle to challenge subject matter jurisdiction after an initial 28 U.S.C. 2255?
III. Does the AEDPA violate a Plea Agreement that does not waive any appeal rights?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Anti-Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA) remains constitutional after Jones v. Hendrix and its impact on subject matter jurisdiction and plea agreements
Docket Entries
2024-10-07
Petition DENIED. Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition. See 28 U. S. C. §455(b)(3) and Code of Conduct for Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States, Canon 3B(2)(e) (prior government employment).
2024-08-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-08-14
Petition for writ of habeas corpus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed.
Attorneys
Eric Matthews
Eric Martin Matthews — Petitioner