WHETHER WAIVING JURY TRIAL IS CONSTITUIONAL UNDER THE 6™ AMENDMENT, WHEN THE 6™ AMENDMENT DID NOT SECURE TRIAL BY JURY AS A RIGHT, WHICH CONSEQUENTLY CAN BE WAIVED.

WHERE AND IWOT tTO COHSffTUION SECURED TO MILITARY ACCUSED A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO A COURT MARTIAL, SUBSEQUENTLY ALLOWING WAIVER OF HIS RIGHTS; 5th RIGHT TO SELF INCRIMINATION, 6th RIGHT TO CONFRONT ACCUSORS, WHICH ARE BEING WAIVED BY A COURT WHEN THERE IS NO CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO HAVE COURT MARTIAL.

WHETHER TOE US COURT OF APPEALS FOR TOE ARMED FORCES HAS JURISDICTION TO HEAR AND AWARD RELEIF PURSUANT TO A PETITION FOR REVIEW Of AREOEESS Of GRIEVANCES UNDER TIE Ist AMENDMENT. RIGHT TO PETITION THE GOVERNMENT FOR A REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES

WHETHER THERE WAS AN IMPROPER CORROSION OEIMERQPER INDUCEMENT OF WAIVER OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS WHEN ACCUSED WASTED TO BELUVE HI IS WAIVING A CONSTITUIONAL RIGHT TO GENERAL COURT MARTIAL, WHEN THERE IS NO CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO HAVE A COURT MARTIAL IN THE CONSTITUTION*

Whether waiving jury trial is constitutional under the 6th Amendment when the amendment did not secure trial by jury as an absolute right