No. 24-5336
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-proceeding competency constitutional-rights due-process liberty-interest sex-offender-registration
Key Terms:
DueProcess Immigration JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess Immigration JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2024-09-30
Question Presented (from Petition)
Because a New York Sex Offender Registration Act proceeding implicates a fundamental liberty interest, requires complex factfinding that necessitates the registrant's input, and includes, by statute, a robust set of due process protections, does the Due Process Clause require the registrant to be competent at that proceeding?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Because a New York Sex Offender Registration Act proceeding implicates a fundamental liberty interest, requires complex factfinding that necessitates the registrant's input, and includes, by statute, a robust set of due process protections, does the Due Process Clause require the registrant to be competent at that proceeding?
Docket Entries
2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-08-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-08-27
Waiver of New York of right to respond submitted.
2024-08-27
Waiver of right of respondent New York to respond filed.
2024-08-27
Waiver of right of respondent New York to respond filed. (Corrected waiver added 8/29/24)
2024-07-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 16, 2024)
2024-05-14
Application (23A1008) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until July 22, 2024.
2024-05-09
Application (23A1008) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from May 22, 2024 to July 21, 2024, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.
Attorneys
Darryl Watts
Lawrence T. Hausman — The Legal Aid Society, Petitioner
New York
Joshua Phillip Weiss — Bronx District Attorney's Office, Respondent