No. 24-5331
Douglas Cornell Jackson v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
Relisted (2)IFP
Key Terms:
DueProcess Takings HabeasCorpus
DueProcess Takings HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2024-12-13
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
WHETHER PRINCIPLES OF COMITY REQUIRE FREQUENT BUT UNAVAILING FAIR PRESENTATIONS OF FEDERAL CLAIMS TO STATE COURTS TO EXCUSE EXHAUSTION, EVEN IF THE STATE COURT DECIDES TO ADJUDICATE A POST-CONVICTION MOTION UNDER MICH. CT. R. 6.502(D).
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether principles of comity require federal courts to excuse exhaustion of state court remedies even if the state court decides not to adjudicate a post-conviction motion
Docket Entries
2024-12-16
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner DENIED.
2024-11-26
Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/13/2024.
2024-11-04
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner.
2024-10-15
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
2024-09-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2024.
2024-08-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 16, 2024)
Attorneys
Douglas Jackson
Douglas Cornell Jackson — Petitioner