Devriawlerez V. Petriclf B. Gm/lmvj
J\ ttowM General No-21 ^iUfi2
Qoes<ia,s re-jodiy Case No 2| -456 pe&n-fcd m refateJn afth<?
Court Gf Appeals of N|h£h Clircwt dated o^>/o\jzo24
Pefih'm: l/iotor f-feo fuxtnrjuez Hernandez
%ese c|Mestrons are related b mu case fad the main defense 1
wt I Fmd the fact that I aw related do another person
hawed Victor Ifernel Rodriquez who iti the Sam ban has
the daft of birth on life/ io whom the« hove
reen round b\am Charges that haw? been found tn miD
(record and thtf4 (S why X have been Judged os redarw
Chvnina for the Commonrtij . Sihce X aw Mot/that f5<
In Wn fling ^00 Will be awe to See in hiu evidence
Presented Who Victor Hvao (Wnarez heallu is tfewand^
fo\ ftedtchS (/JKIlCh Ct{\CiCnt<i <^Yy\U fwflgylCty i(^t5
Well as the msolf Of mj recad Jetted of
fecommendation from my f^enis cut WfcVK Church/wd
Same Other feorAe Who tonow rrje Qnd 'fthCly ofrviy
human yualittee
±-C I Want tpKncw if at the of isswhy aSenfence «c,in5t
Me -Che Fmqer pints .^3° ^b^vez.htmar^ei 1
and Victor Nlaivel |W<i<p?, both With date ref btdh life 1^4
have beev) Compared ?
d I Would (iKe ■fo Krww/ What deRn5e e>i<s4s m m<j Jaw fiy M
Case 4ha+ X F^eseni Gsvtiaeui ' bwief, tynene 1 Sl&t 1WI
wa* mot duly aavised cwi re-sented i\a wiy case?

2r d V\)ba+ ^ na-f'pe 'nin^f iff nuf ^lioaiion <Since I Was left defcwebs ^WU lmW.evavs
uhu

Whether the petitioner's constitutional rights were violated due to potential misidentification and lack of due process in a criminal case involving Victor Hugo Gomarez Hernandez