1) ES TT RACTAL DTSCRTIMINATTON By THE
STATE AND FEDERAL COURTS, WHEN A WHITE
DEPENDANT RAISES A CLAIM OR ~rssueE AND
THE COURTS TELLS HTM HE 2S CORRECT AND
GRANTS THE REQUESTED RELIER BuT WHEN A
BLACK DEFENDANT RATSES THE EXACT SAME |
CLAIM OR "ISWE THE COURTS TELLS ++IM
HE <S WRONG SRS AND REFUSES TO.
CoRANT RELLEF 7

2) WHETER A CRIMINAL DEFENDANTS RIGHT
De Jute AMENDMENT OF THE U.S. CONSTI
UUTTON Ts VTOLATED WHEN THE STATE OF
-GEORGTA TAKES THE EXAOT SAME STATUTORY
LéAw AND APPITES Tr DIFFERENTLY TIN A _
WHITE DEFENDANTS CASE To His ADVANTAGE
AND To Ac BLACK DEFENDANTS CASE 76 HIS
DISADVANTAGE °

3) Dogs IT VIOLATE THE UNETED STATES i
AE THE LAW" UNDER THE 14h AMENDMENT, "LF as
BLACK DEFENDANT "1S MOT GIVEN THE SAME 3
TREATMENT OF LAW AS A WHITE DEFENDANT'

4) WHETHER THE STATE AND FEDERAL COURTS

) a tHe "Rreur" To MAKE ADVERSE RULINGS

AGAINST BLACK DEFENDANTS, WHEN THE SAME
COURTS MADE A FAVORABLE Ru TANG FOR A Wize
DEFENDANT CONCERNTIIG THe EXACT SAME. LAW,
EACTS, AMD TSSUE ?

Whether state and federal courts can make conflicting rulings when a defendant raises the exact same legal claim