Whether the Third Circuit's decision affirming Petitioner's conviction is erroneous because the evidence in the record was insufficient to establish that he had the specific "intent to cause, attempt to cause or would be reasonably expected to cause substantial emotional duress" as required by the Cyberstalking Statute, 28 U.S.C. § 2261A(A)(2)(B), or that the Petitioner made a "true threat" as that term has been interpreted by this Court under the First Amendment of the Constitution.

Whether the Third Circuit's decision affirming Petitioner's cyberstalking conviction is erroneous due to insufficient evidence of intent to cause emotional distress or a true threat under the First Amendment