Alexander A. Fels v. Joseph R. Biden, Jr., President of the United States, et al.
1) IS THE CURE STA ON 14 ARITODALS EQNERAL AGENC! ULU.d ) AN VREOEN DEVELOP MEST ANSWERING THE vst of MEOCHHE MALITVASA BY ALC THE RESIDES OF THE Ho vs IG U.N. OVECSEES A Viotation OF Tit€ El Qutel ACT cle OF AmMennmMenrt OF THE Constitution OF THE UNITED STATES?
2) TS THE PRoMsEn CrAnGe 0 F THE ScHEDLOLWS OF MaAeiToAWA From BE LQVATER AS ANLVG AS Letua As UEere To tHE CLASSIFYING OF N41 Tua On THe S4me LEVEL As AWAGouic STEMoNS A VALID (8RRELATION ©
3) TS$ THE FENELAL GoYeenmeEntr's LONG Time PRoMULGAT On, THA ARI TIANA 4 ATEWAY NLUG To HEtOIr ARDICTION A Ao 4 PoTHE Sis 2
4) wilu THE RoPOSED RE CLASSIFICA Tron) OF MARIANA ALE THE CoURT RULINGS CITe BY THE DSM T covet TS Tt's NENG OF ml NIT AC: PETITION STi VA me : JIN AY DNITI AL FILING IN HE DISTRICT CVC, F Posen 18 iG uteer) Ave Tron. THe Hiest WAS" Or) DUM Fou 4 CAT HES EXVision AcTiVE SHorTeg LULS AS PART OF OVR CHILDREDRS SeHoLASTIC WR cuLuMe
5) WAS THE 1 céPrion oF THE "AEmowreuE _! OF MAGITUANO RACIALLY MNomVATER ?
6) Aree THE CFINIONS OF TIE UNITED STATES i SvmeemEe CoVAT SURBTET To CEvEeSAL ?
7) IS Tet€_ United STATES SuPREmE Cove#»r 4 Co- EQunr Be Kes OF THE FENECRC : Goveenmesst?
Whether the Supreme Court should review the classification of an immigrant's legal status and potential constitutional violations related to deportation proceedings