Did the trial court error and/or abuse its discretion by not allowing petitioner to amend his complaint for the first time as a matter of right or course?

Does Or. Rev. Stat. § 138.590(8)(b) mitigate, trump or nullify the effects of Or. Rev. Stat. § 18.345(l)(o) (2011) and Schlunt v. Nooth, Multnomah County Cir. Court Case No. 06-03-31323 (2013) rev den (Or. App. 2014)?

Did the trial court error and/or abuse its discretion in concluding that Petitioner's claims under Or. Rev. Stat. § 18.345(1)(o) (2011) and Schlunt v. Nooth, 261 Or. App. 866, 326 P.3d 1289, rev den (Or. App. 2014), were barred?

What is the point of Federalism?

Do courts have inherent authority to appoint counsel regardless of the existence of any specific statute authorizing such?

Did the trial court err and/or abuse its discretion by not allowing petitioner to amend his complaint and by concluding that claims were barred under Oregon state law?