No. 24-5267
Richard George Baxter v. State Bar of California
IFP
Tags: content-based-restriction embezzlement first-amendment fraud-regulation mortgage-fraud strict-scrutiny
Latest Conference:
2024-10-11
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. The first questions presented is whether a California law requiring fraud embezzlement, and forgery are legitimate covering the court proceedings.
2. The second question presented is whether the government can defeat an Amendment challenge.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a California law restricting fraud, embezzlement, and forgery proceedings is subject to strict scrutiny under the First Amendment
Docket Entries
2024-10-15
Petition DENIED.
2024-09-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/11/2024.
2024-04-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 9, 2024)
Attorneys
Richard G. Baxter
Richard George Baxter — Petitioner