\Adun <x W^\ucV c^ci 4te orkkj w&k<*j4-^ ?ro?P^r ^>sWi4-?6r\ k tie alW) a a**. 4o frtc&J
Os^l ct\\.tOz (Mins In^ V^r Case (\&n-Um 4r +ke offeah
CDorV ac Vxj'eVV &S £oif Ca?>e e6\£t^2-c4-~&vits''- i*\t joc 4h^_
blSV^-V CziOri SlvS£v,&6 Jk Et£> , C6 .-te 4l/\e Cl?/Ws CocJff^iWiOtAj CoOti
C\vve£ o(\i4e4 stales &kWd- Juist ticWi E.lHYersJX \0k<$ m 14 k
Tm)o\i d C6;aPIoua4 ^ >4- Wc/{ Wt\e PfoPef \Jti\ u<? 4o> l>o C?le3 a4-fte
UtrY kaS-k ite a\cvW€_ tfote ikarv i/v 4kc 4rm tf- a 3u&qw &
4W cWe.fi ^dctoe. &\ ^ !62.s3r\W c&olc\ +lve ftPPe&te
CbtirX 4ke urvtte crates te 4 We iour-Vk CTrcoIV ak>d p(jj£
4Ve_ Scxf^e CtWlafnA c^rv afPeal Pram 4ke Unkkcl skks DkkW4- t&rfW 4W 6ciS4tf(y. c) < <Vf/o4- £>P~ AocVk Ca fol/ i\ a Wesk^/'iv 1k 4ke
C^lfit-V CoUffs Xf\Ja\»4 ^d^/d^e/rf LJd^ (xffi'rnecl by 4h£. fkdf4k Or tori
jjvaiW aueaU <f\ i4- . uVmcW is olso To i/aIAc) iJe/Y,
l K& \-OLif 4k. C(t Cur-J- C6i3f4 .6$- Ck??ea\^ u)£/\4 St tQ/" c?a Vd
(V^cteloA-t W -Vke oo\ d| SarkW)ikte cm 4Kq4 i$ f\o\jd beuij
?e^Voi V 4ke 0/\ry slate So)W Cauf A 4ke m
4k'/S Ca^e art Sc&fl S HaffVS, Ut ClCrff 4 <?odf4 CMh/ 1 4 AI^as

Whether the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals improperly affirmed a district court judgment in a case involving federal sentencing guidelines and judicial discretion