(I)
Did the U S District courts ,failure to allow relevant evidence
into trial proceeding violate ,Brady Rule of Evidence under
Brad
■Out.iv v Maryland 373 U.S.83 (see page four)
Pfocu,^ V)&c*\ - AUo i&'ojW -to V\tsve l. SGYl^ P'TDCtSS

(XI)
Did the District Courts abuse it's discretion by submitting to
the jury the question of objectticnal reasonableness of Certanez
behavior-mistakenly /injected an"objectively unreasonable" ele
ment, into clearly established law prong of qualified immunity ana
lysis.? Aywedcv

(m)
Did Certanez action ,violate Cruz's right to be free from harm hei
led,under the Eight Amendment of the United States Constitution.
Did the action or the failure to act properly by Certanez violate
Texas Safe Prison Act?

Did the U.S. District courts' failure to allow relevant evidence into trial proceedings violate the Brady Rule of Evidence under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, and the Due Process Clause of the 5th and 14th Amendments?