No. 24-5237
Warren Alexander v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review circuit-split criminal-procedure due-process presentence-report sentencing supervised-release
Latest Conference:
2024-09-30
Question Presented (from Petition)
Should the Court grant the petition in order to resolve a conflict among the circuits as to whether a district court in imposing sentence is required to pronounce orally those conditions of supervisory release that it intends to order, where those conditions have been set forth in the recommendations of the presentence report that have been reviewed by the defendant?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
criminal-sentencing
Docket Entries
2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-08-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-08-09
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2024-08-09
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-08-03
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 5, 2024)
Attorneys
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Warren Alexander
Jeremiah Donovan — Attorney at Law, Petitioner