Whether the Eleventh Circuit's Standard of Review for Sixth Amendment Speedy Trial Rights That Involve "Mixed Questions of Law and Fact" Conflicts With This Court's Established Precedent Which Requires De Novo Review of Constitutional Issues, Reserving Only Questions of Historical Fact for Clear Error Review.

Whether the Eleventh Circuit's standard of review for Sixth Amendment speedy trial rights that involve 'mixed questions of law and fact' conflicts with this Court's established precedent which requires de novo review of constitutional issues, reserving only questions of historical fact for clear error review