Bobbie Ray Edwards v. United States
1) Whether the DisTReT COusTs dewial For sLaelh of Sues diCNow awd dew er sene of debewdauits Timely fled 2255 (1G) mation OTe SUa spoule Rechoradlarzabeay oF y Pel dans matios a4 a" Setoud awd SULSS VE meétiod Under QaSd ith) wwaS Grranegus, and iMmacoper GoeeNT Aagreamnewl o% opportoniTy Te withdicaw MeTION?
2) Whiter "Boreders Glodey' ivvelula FAx@)O) Lov awhawte aneatt wav dor the ened Caveer Ocleniual ALF (ACCA) has LowShTTiowal Features Lor CO puxpasss under I253¢ Jaye
3) Whether Trane is a velicle thet 4 prose Wigan? cay seek veliel if he is ifleg ally uw ished under The Raed Caireae Gat aa fee L Ret (ACCA) Statute, beyond The sTate's power Te PANT Sh, if heis NOT uwdet CO Wateral review, i tre Parbheres of Seah ae
Whether the district court's denial of petitioner's timely filed 2255(h) motion was erroneous and deprived petitioner of due process of law and an opportunity to withdraw the motion?