Curtis Mitchell Paul v. United States
Whether a police officer violates the Fourth Amendment when he seizes for criminal investigation a pedestrian walking in the vicinity of a recent robbery when the officer has on his smart phone three color images of the robbery suspect wearing attire that does not match the pedestrian's attire, and no commonsense inference or officer experience can explain away the mismatch.
Whether a police officer violates the Fourth Amendment when he seizes for criminal investigation a pedestrian walking in the vicinity of a recent robbery when the officer has on his smart phone three color images of the robbery suspect wearing attire that does not match the pedestrian's attire, and no commonsense inference or officer experience can explain away the mismatch