No. 24-5162

Johnny Ho v. United States

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2024-07-29
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure fair-trial impartial-jury judicial-discretion jury-selection peremptory-challenges sixth-amendment voir-dire
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2024-09-30
Question Presented (from Petition)

This petition involves questions of exceptional importance for jury selection in trials in all jurisdictions across our nation, involving the process for seating a jury to assure every defendant his or her Sixth Amendment right to a fair trial by a fair and impartial jury, as follows:

1. Is a defendant's right to a fair trial denied when every single juror seated on his jury is permitted to remain silent rather than answer important questions asked of them during jury selection?

2. Is a defendant in a criminal trial denied a fair and impartial jury when all of the jurors who were selected and seated on the jury had been asked several important questions calling for a "yes or no" answer and none of these jurors answered a single one of these important questions?

3. If every prosecutive juror within the jury venire is asked 32 questions and not a single prospective juror gives any verbal answer to any of these questions, including questions that call for a yes or no answer - even when the question includes phrases that call for a verbal answer such as, "Does everyone understand that principle?"; "Do you all understand that?"; "Do you think you could be fair and impartial?"; "Will all of you agree to apply the same standards for judging credibility. . . ?"; "Do you agree to abide by those instructions?"; and "If you were on trial, would you be willing to be tried by a jury with someone who has the same frame of mind as yours?" ; (1) can it be said that defendant was able to effectively use his preemptory challenges?; and (2) can the defendant be assured that his guilt or innocence is being decided by a fair and impartial jury?

4. Did the judge deny the petitioner a fair trial when she improperly allowed all of the prospective jurors to choose not to answer questions that called for a specific answer, when she gave them the option to not answer any of the questions by deferring to the prospective jurors' preferences when stating, "if you . . . want to respond to … any of these questions, I ask that you raise your hand"?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Defendant's right to a fair trial by impartial jury

Docket Entries

2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-08-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-08-05
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2024-08-05
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-07-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 28, 2024)

Attorneys

Johnny Ho
Mitchell T. FosterMitchell T. Foster, P.C., d/b/a Mitch Foster Law, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent