No. 24-5137
IFP
Tags: anders-v-california appeal-process case-remand civil-procedure court-procedure due-process frivolous-appeal judicial-review legal-interpretation procedural-rules remand standing
Latest Conference:
2024-09-30
Question Presented (from Petition)
"Did the Court err concluding the appeal was frivolous when the appeal in accordance with 38 U.S.C. § 38 (CMT) when it was presented to a mirror published case remanded by U.S. v. Anders v. California?"
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Court err Concluding at Frivolous was the aPpeal in accordance wilh Anders ¥. California 386 U.S, #38 C96) When it Was oresented yout a mirror published Case remonded?
Docket Entries
2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-09-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-07-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 26, 2024)
Attorneys
Gerardo Ogaz
Gerardo Ogaz — Petitioner