Wke-4-kdf the 7^ Clrculi ke\s ^a^c-tfooed so A tu*e-from He accepted and d } an a e-pan t\sua
op judicial proceed; ajs ky ike. fJctiherA ■£)\strict of _Xy/ i not z
C-1 c/P "fk !rS Cou«f sto oa. ll Pe>n ci *1 O-i-Of " C<s u. rSe,so as
supct'vi&ay po\*nr i\ tkis § Z2.zs4 lakeaS auS&- ^terc district
tf Otft^ -finding tknt the state post convicti^pnosecat-er ^''ASA'O #nd pub)} c
f'A)nA.4c.ty and u/\jU.s4}Piably de-kjcd ike. po$t conviction case, tfftk He.tr conceded
ef&rk 'fo coeic&nl U& grossly muteri*lly, &Isified ir-id transcript- tro*u-tU s4a4* £*,u4s
und ^4~a4c Au4L&t'i4i*S ^ Ct*d ctftcf the. ^4\x4s- twice, conceded the. facjual oend lejal sufft
itmcics o-P the. record-based bahta-s alai>nsCour ion c&urdtfcnd&r iIf) O
i C4 re pu.se c( to adjudle&t
(as 4o Lott ike. sukst-Antive, habeas ciai^s'the- districtC-ounJ
the. aedv. a ( ala /*vvjy iss «es, and d « A
and f^uin T» ike. CO 6>) <nok&t\ 's procedural defects)] an-d tnsfcuJtd in Vetdee) all —etnses
'fii.ke.ACW
nd defenses ~h> deade, !n -favor of the. State. c-ldf ivys 1 j evi dfyt\c&j
me. <o^j,cc-i live, or &\jpn rule.and rePu.se d -fo I*-4AJ
My Wfl-l-H&n <skj deti ©<iS j e4-fec.tLve.ly Si ienet'nj
Court j and He- ^ Circuit repeatedly CeiLsed Cent/ 4-cates &P Aff<a fnbi Hfy l*z*d
these fhlse men4s J an,d which district courts Actionsout ofCv) me.
cett tinned Very effectively
the criminal cover-up of He /4S43T and court reporters crimes & -P*lsity)nj the. trf«l
the public and /aw c.n-force-me^cf uutho rltt cs} hy He. sa#u, districtCpa
transcript) from
judge uho feiAA d fhi, ^*SAs And court reporters

Whether the district court's actions in this § 2254 habeas case sanctioned a departure from the accepted and usual course of judicial proceedings