No. 24-5117
Terrance Nathaniel Brown, Jr. v. United States
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: 21-usc-841 acquitted-conduct due-process ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel jury-trial sentencing-enhancement sentencing-guidelines statutory-interpretation statutory-sentencing
Latest Conference:
2024-12-06
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
A. Whether counsel was ineffective for failing to argue that the general verdict required that the statutory sentence be based on marijuana under 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(D) and that the sentencing court erred in imposing a sentence above the statutory maximum.
B. Whether Brown's right to due process and a jury trial was violated when the court increased Brown's sentence based on conduct Brown was acquitted of committing after a jury trial.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether counsel was ineffective for failing to argue that the statutory sentence be based on marijuana under 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(D) and that the sentencing court erred in imposing a sentence above the statutory maximum
Docket Entries
2024-12-09
Rehearing DENIED.
2024-11-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/6/2024.
2024-10-21
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-08-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-07-30
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2024-07-30
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-07-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 19, 2024)
Attorneys
Terrance Brown
Matthew McGavock Robinson — Robinson & Brandt, PSC, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent