(1) whether the court below erred by upholding the application of Section 3Al.4's Terrorism Enhancement when the evidence presented at trial, or lack thereof, failed to prove Mr. Khweis's conduct met the burden necessary to reach the first prong of §3A1.4.

(2) whether the function of the Terrorism Enhancement is impermissible under the sentencing paradigm.

Whether the Terrorism Enhancement under U.S.S.G. §3A1.4 was properly applied when the evidence failed to prove the defendant's conduct met the statutory requirements for a 'federal crime of terrorism'