No. 24-5095
Moises Gamboa v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-law criminal-procedure cruel-and-unusual-punishment eighth-amendment sentencing-guidelines statutory-construction statutory-interpretation united-states-constitution
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2024-09-30
Question Presented (from Petition)
DID THE LOWER COURTS IMPROPERLY INTERPRET UNITED STATES SENTENCING GUIDELINE § 4C1.1 THAT VIOLATED THE CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT CLAUSE OF THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES?
DID THE LOWER COURTS DECISION CONTRADICT THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES ESTABLISHED PRINCIPLES OF ENGLISH GRAMMAR, STATUTORY CONSTRUCTION, AND STATUTORY INTERPRETATION?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the lower courts improperly interpret United States Sentencing Guideline § 4C1.1 that violated the Cruel and Unusual Punishment Clause of the Eighth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States?
Docket Entries
2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-08-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-07-29
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2024-07-29
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-07-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 16, 2024)
Attorneys
Moises Gamboa
Moises Gamboa — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent