No. 24-5085
Philip Layfield, aka Philip Samuel Pesin v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 18-usc-3161 70-day-trial-clock custodial-defendant out-of-district-arrest speedy-trial-act statutory-remedy transportation-delay trial-clock
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2024-09-30
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the Speedy Trial Act provides a remedy for a custodial defendant arrested out-of-district and ordered removed, but whose transportation back to the charging district for arraignment is delayed for more than the 10-day period deemed reasonable under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(1)(F), thereby creating a violation of the 70-day trial clock.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Speedy Trial Act provides a remedy for a custodial defendant arrested out-of-district and ordered removed, but whose transportation back to the charging district for arraignment is delayed for more than the 10-day period deemed reasonable under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(1)(F), thereby creating a violation of the 70-day trial clock
Docket Entries
2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-08-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-07-29
Waiver of United States of right to respond submitted.
2024-07-29
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-07-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 15, 2024)
Attorneys
Philip Layfield
Katherine Windsor — Law Office of Katherine Kimball Windsor, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent