Whether non-adherence to Turner procedural protections, under 45 CFR § 303.6(c)(4-5), violates substantive due process as well as privileges and immunities when fundamental rights and liberties are implicated, affronts the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment as well as the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment, from which equitable relief is available, as found by Massachusetts, Nebraska, and Nevada as well as the First, Third, Sixth, Eighth, Ninth, and Eleventh Circuits, or is instead moot, as found in Ohio and Texas.

Whether a dignity factor, scrutiny under substantive due process, or with privileges and immunities, as well as by specific Amendments may supplant the Mathews factors and Turner procedural protections in proceedings under Part D of Title IV of the Social Security Act when fundamental rights and liberties are at stake.

Does lack of perfection of service divest a trial court of subject matter jurisdiction under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, for "any matters, " after confirmation of the registration of an order under the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act.

Whether non-adherence to Turner procedural protections violates substantive-due-process-and-privileges-and-immunities,takings-clause,due-process-and-equal-protection,equitable-relief