Adam Sprenger v. United States
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
[Brief explanation of question] A defendant who him
or herself alone engages in sexually explicit
conduct without a minor's engagement is indicted
for a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2251(a).
Question :1.
Have the federal courts misinterpreted
and misapplied 18 U.S.C. § 2251(a) et. seq. to en
-** encompass conduct neither proscribed nor enumerated:■• i
in 18 U.S.C. § 2251(a) et. seq.?
[Brief explanation of question] A defendant
stipulates to a stipulated offense conduct (as if
he or she were convicted of the other offense) in a
plea agreement. Subsequent to this, there is a
change in law.
Question:2.
Can a stipulation to a stipulated
offense conduct in a plea agreement remain
enforceable after a change in law?
Have the federal courts misinterpreted and misapplied 18 U.S.C. § 2251(a) et. seq. to encompass conduct neither proscribed nor enumerated in 18 U.S.C. § 2251(a) et. seq.?