Dennis German v. United States
(1). Weather the Government violated the
Petitioner's 8th Amendment. Constitutional
Rights (To be free from infliction of Cruel
and Unusual Punishment)[Relevant Part], and
The 5th Amendment, [Relevant Part],
By being in Non-Compliance
with the U.S.S.G using Cases or Incidents
Seperated' by Intervening' Arrest: July 26,
2019, November 26, 2019, and March 20, 2020 a
being incidents related to the offense
conduct that occurred on June 29, 2020 as
Relevant Conduct. When there was different
drug types, different users, and different
location, along with months, in between the: Due
Process
arrest .
(2) Weather the Government violated the
Petioner's 4th Amendment Constitutional
Rights (Expectation of Privacy )[Relevant
Parts], By Seizing & Forfeiting currency in
violation of the 14th Amendment [Due Process
Clause ][Relevant Part] Equal Protection of
the Law. That was seized & forfeited by local
law enforcement agencies on July 26, 2019
($1,003); November 26, 2019; ($53,843.66);
March 20, 2020($2,692) which are not related
to the incident and conviction of offense
that occurred on June 29, 2020. Also was the
Government further in Non-Compliance with
Fed. R. of Crim. P. 32.2(a) and 41(g). In
violation of the 7th Amendment
Constitutionally Protected Rights.
(3)Whether Petitioner was denied Effective
Assistance of Counsel, When Counsel failed
to object to the inclusion of separate
arrest,, involving separate conduct as
relevant conduct of a continued criminal
episode, that was objected to in the Plea
Agreement and counsel informed Petitioner
that he would be able to present any
challenges during the sentencing phase. Did
the Counsel's advice cause a defect in the
proceedings resulting in the Court's 3553(a)
sentencing factors denial of acceptance of
responsibility, Guideline Adjustments?
Whether the government violated the petitioner's 8th Amendment and 5th Amendment constitutional rights by using separate incidents as relevant conduct for sentencing purposes, and whether the government violated the petitioner's 4th Amendment rights by seizing and forfeiting currency unrelated to the offense of conviction