No. 24-5052
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: 14th-amendment 5th-amendment constitutional-violation court-of-appeal criminal-procedure double-jeopardy due-process fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment habeas-corpus legal-relief
Key Terms:
DueProcess Securities
DueProcess Securities
Latest Conference:
2024-11-22
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Did the Third District Court of Appeal Violate Section (9) in the
Constitution of the State of Florida Due Process-No person shall be
deprived of life, liberty, or property or without due process of law, or be
twice put in jeopardy for the same offense or be compelled in any
criminal matter to be witness against oneself?
2. Did the Third District Court of Appeal of Florida ("the third DCA ")
Violate the due process of the 5th and 14th Amendment of the U. S.
Constitution?
3. Whether Petitioner is entitled to relief pursuant to 28 U. S. C. 1651(a)
to vacate the order of the Third District Court of Appeal of Florida ("the
third DCA ") or other relief as this Court deems appropriate.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Due process-violation
Docket Entries
2024-11-25
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner DENIED.
2024-11-06
Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/22/2024.
2024-10-18
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner.
2024-10-07
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of mandamus is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2024-08-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-07-03
Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 12, 2024)
Attorneys
Kenton G. Findlay
Kenton G. Findlay — Petitioner