WHETHER WAIVING JURY TRIAL IS CONSTITUIONAL UNDER THE 6th AMENDMENT, WHEN THE 6th AMENDMENT DID NOT SECURE TRIAL BY JURY AS A RIGHT, WHICH CONSEQUENTLY CAN BE WAIVED.

WHERE AND WHEN DID THE CONSTITUION SECURED TO MILITARY ACCUSED A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO A COURT MARTIAL, SUBSEQUENTLY ALLOWING WAIVER OF HIS RIGHTS; 5th RIGHT TO SELF INCRIMINATION, 6™ RIGHT TO CONFRONT ACCUSORS, WHICH ARE BEING WAIVED BY A COURT WHEN THERE IS NO CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO HAVE COURT MARTIAL.

WHETHER THE US COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES HAS JURISDICTION TO HEAR AND AWARD RELEIF PURSUANT TO A PETITION FOR REVIEW OF A REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES UNDER THE 1st AMENDMENT. RIGHT TO PETITION THE GOVERNMENT FOR A REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES

WHETHER THERE WAS AN IMPROPER COERCISION OR IMPROPER INDUCEMENT OF WAIVER OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS WHEN ACCUSED WAS LED TO BELIEVE HE IS WAIVING A CONSTITUIONAL RIGHT TO GENERAL COURT MARTIAL, WHEN THERE IS NO CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO HAVE A COURT MARTIAL IN THE CONSTITUTION.

Question not identified