Was Defendant 'Prejudiced' And Denied His Constitutional Right To The Effective Assistance Of Appellate Counsel On [Direct-Appeal] For Failing To Raise A Plain And Obvious [Trial Court Error 4]', Where The [State Concedes ], And The [Appellate Court Agree 1s] That The Trial Court Made A Plain And Obvious [Trial Court Error] Pursuant To Illinois Supreme Court Rule 431(b) To Identify And Prevent [From Serving On The Jury] Any Potential Juror Who Is "Prejudiced" Against The "Bedrock Principles Of Anglo-American Criminal Law", Where The Trial Court's Failure To Strickly Comply With Rule 431(b) Threatens The Integrity Of, And Casts Doubt On, The Fundamental Fairness Of The Entire Trial Process?

was-defendant-prejudiced-and-denied-his-constitutional-right-to-the-effective-assistance-of-appellate-counsel