No. 24-5045

Charles N. Belssner v. Casablanca Homeowners Association, et al.

Lower Court: Nevada
Docketed: 2024-07-10
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: abuse-of-discretion civil-procedure due-process judicial-discretion judicial-misconduct judicial-review legal-procedure nrs-enforcement standing statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference: 2024-09-30
Question Presented (from Petition)

1) 6/21/ 2$:
SHOULD ACT(S). OP WILFULL NEGLLIGEENfCE SHOULD BE
)
STRICKEN! WHEN THE PRESIDING JUDGE STATED ON RECORD:
"HARMFUL ENFINOMENT TO BELIVING IN"
PAGe 23, Line 1-6 MARCffi 14, 2 023

2 / 7/2(2 4 ^
SEE KING REMOVAAL OF JUDGE FOR "FA I LORRE TO
ENFORCCE NRS 38. 31 0: WHICH RELLEFE OF HARM"
THEREBY KEEP INN ALL CLAIMS INTACT &. WHOLE
IS THIS NOT ABUSE OF DISCRETION?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Question not identified

Docket Entries

2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-08-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-08-06
Waiver of right of respondent Casablanca Homeowners Association, et al. to respond filed.
2024-06-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due August 9, 2024)

Attorneys

Casablanca Homeowners Association, et al.
Todd W. PrallHutchinson & Steffen, PLLC, Respondent
Charles N. Belssner
Charles N. Belssner — Petitioner