1.) Should Due Process of Law as mandated by
the United States Constitution Fourteenth
Amendment be afforded to self-represented
litigant Plaintiff related to Civil Case against
Defendant on the Matters of Infliction of
Emotional Distress and Plaintiffs claims
against Defendants to the United States
Bankruptcy Court and Leave to Amend
Complaint?

2.) Should self-represented litigant Plaintiffs
Right to Appeal / review Civil Cases and
Tolling Doctrines and Exceptions to res
judicatas be afforded?

3.) Should Conflict of Interest discovered by
Petitioner in regards to Presiding Justice
Kathleen O'Leary, CA Court of Appeals 4th
District, Division Three (CCP 170.1-170.9)
and her spouse Kenneth Babcock, Director of
Public Law Center being recipient of multi
thousand dollar 's gifts / donations from
MUFG Holding Corporation, et al. (and for
which Presiding Justice O'Leary denied her
own recusal) be sufficient to vacate
dismissal judgements of this case?

Whether a self-represented litigant's due process rights were violated in a civil case involving emotional distress claims, bankruptcy court proceedings, and potential judicial conflict of interest