No. 24-450
Ohio, et al. v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.
Response Waived
Experienced Counsel
Tags: administrative-record agency-action chenery-doctrine clean-air-act judicial-review rulemaking-procedure
Key Terms:
Environmental AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities
Environmental AdministrativeLaw SocialSecurity Securities
Latest Conference:
2025-01-10
Question Presented (from Petition)
whether the Clean Air Act permits remand to the EPA to supplement the administrative record with new information and justifications after a rule is promulgated.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Clean Air Act permits remand to the EPA to supplement the administrative record with new information and justifications after a rule is promulgated
Docket Entries
2025-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2024-12-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2025.
2024-12-23
Reply of Ohio, et al. submitted.
2024-12-23
Reply of petitioners Ohio, et al. filed. (Distributed)
2024-12-10
Brief of Federal Respondents in opposition filed.
2024-12-10
Waiver of right of respondents Air Alliance Houston, Appalachian Mountain Club, Center for Biological Diversity, Chesapeake Bay Foundation, et al. to respond filed.
2024-12-10
Brief of state respondents in opposition filed.
2024-11-21
Brief of industry respondents American Chemistry Council, et al. in support filed.
2024-11-18
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 10, 2024, for all respondents.
2024-11-15
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 10, 2024.
2024-11-15
Motion of state respondents and public interest respondents to extend the time to file a response from November 21, 2024 to December 10, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2024-11-14
Motion of EPA, et al. for an extension of time submitted.
2024-11-14
Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 21, 2024 to December 10, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
2024-10-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 21, 2024)
Attorneys
Air Alliance Houston, Appalachian Mountain Club, Center for Biological Diversity, Chesapeake Bay Foundation, et al.
Kathleen Lea Riley — Earthjustice, Respondent
EPA, et al.
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Midwest Ozone Group, American Forest & Paper Association, and American Iron and Steel Institute
David M. Flannery — Steptoe & Johnson PLLC, Respondent
New York, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin; the District of Columbia; and Harris County, Texas
Barbara Dale Underwood — Solicitor General, Respondent
Ohio, et al.
Thomas Elliot Gaiser — Office of the Ohio Attorney General, Petitioner