No. 24-448

Oskana Marinaro v. Parks Ziegler, PLLC

Lower Court: Virginia
Docketed: 2024-10-22
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: appellate-review attorney-fees due-process fourteenth-amendment pro-se-representation state-law
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2025-02-28 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)

1). The XIV Amendment of the United States Constitution guarantees the due process of law. Can a state appellate court refuse to provide full appellate review in absence of transcript while the state law requires to consider the issue on appeal based on the written pleadings from a lower court?

2). The XIV Amendment of the United States Constitution guarantees the due process of law. Can a state court award attorney's fees to a self-represented law firm in its own legal proceedings, in which the law firm proceeded pro se, while the state statute permits the award of actual attorney's fees incurred by a party?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a state appellate court can refuse full appellate review without a transcript when state law requires review based on written pleadings

Docket Entries

2025-03-03
Rehearing DENIED.
2025-02-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/28/2025.
2024-12-19
2024-11-25
Petition DENIED.
2024-11-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/22/2024.
2024-10-31
Waiver of right of respondent Parks Zeigler, PLLC to respond filed.
2024-10-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 21, 2024)

Attorneys

Oskana Marinaro
Oskana Marinaro — Petitioner
Parks Zeigler, PLLC
Brandon ZeiglerParks Zeigler, Respondent