No. 24-431

Danny Ray Dunn v. Caryn Alissa Dunn

Lower Court: Georgia
Docketed: 2024-10-17
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: appellate-procedure constitutional-rights due-process fourteenth-amendment judicial-ethics recusal-motion
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2025-01-10
Question Presented (from Petition)

Is a lack of an adequate recusal enforcement mechanism, as evidenced by the Georgia Court of Appeal's ignoring the recusal motion and by the Georgia Supreme Court denial of relief sought, a violation of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment?

Do the procedural timeframe rules in the State of Georgia's discretionary review statues render the code section unconstitutional because such requirements deny citizens access to federal constitutional rights on an arbitrary basis as demonstrated by the Georgia appellate courts denying a request to firmly establish judicial procedural rules?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the lack of an adequate recusal enforcement mechanism in Georgia state courts violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment

Docket Entries

2025-01-13
Petition DENIED.
2024-12-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2025.
2024-09-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 18, 2024)

Attorneys

Danny R. Dunn
Danny Ray Dunn — Petitioner