No. 24-42
Scott Meide v. Pulse Evolution Corporation, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: civil-procedure corporate-assignment due-process federal-rules-civil-procedure federal-rules-of-civil-procedure judicial-interpretation legal-standing procedural-rules separation-of-powers standing unbiased-judiciary
Latest Conference:
2024-09-30
Question Presented (from Petition)
I
Has F.R.Civ. P. I been abrogated by judicial fiat?
II
Should the Rules Concerning Unpublished Opinions
Be Rewritfen and/or Modified?
Do We Have a Government Of Laws And Not Of
Men (or Women)?
IV
May A Corporation Assign Its Interest In A Lawsuit to
a Non-Lawyer?
V
Did the District Court Subject Petitioner To A
Piecemeal Appeal?
VI
Should Plaintiff Have Been Granted Discovery?
VII
Were The Sanctions Imposed Unreasonable?
VIII
Was Petitioner Entitled To An Unbiased Judge?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Has F.R.Civ. P. been abrogated by judicial fiat?
Docket Entries
2024-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2024-08-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
2024-08-08
Waiver of right of respondents John King, Agnes King, Greg Centineo and Julie Natale to respond filed.
2024-03-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 15, 2024)
Attorneys
John King, Agnes King, Greg Centineo and Julie Natale
Michael D. Lee — The Liles Firm, P.A., Respondent
Scott Meide
Scott Meide — Petitioner