No. 24-367

Scott York v. United States, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2024-10-01
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: brain-computer-interface constitutional-rights directed-energy-weapons due-process judicial-misconduct sua-sponte-order
Latest Conference: 2024-11-22
Question Presented (from Petition)

A. DO THE NINTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS PANELS ' (EN BANC) RULING, THE NINTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS ' ORIGINAL RULING, AND THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 'S RULINGS CONFLICT WITH A DECISIONS) OF THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT THEREBY CREATING NECESSARY REVIEW BY THE SUPREME COURT TO SECURE AND MAINTAIN UNIFORMITY OF THE COURT'S PRECEDENT?

B. DOES THE COURTS ACTIVE INVOLVEMENT IN FRAUDULENTLY CONCEALING THE ILLEGAL AND UNCONSTITUTIONAL USE OF BRAIN-COMPUTER INTERFACE ("BCI") DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPONS ("DEW ") BY DEFENDANTS, PROCEEDINGS BROUGHT BY UNITED STATES CITIZEN AND CIVILIAN PLAINTIFF- APPELLANT-PETITIONER, RESULTING IN ONGOING CONTROL AND ATTACKS ON 'SHOCK THE CONSCIENCE? 'GOVERNMENT IN

C. IS IT AN ABUSE OF THE COURT 'S SUA SPONTE AUTHORITY PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, RULE 12(b)(6) AND RULE 15(a) FOR A JUDGE VIA ISSUANCE OF A SUA SPONTE ORD ER(S)/RULIN G(S) TO INTENTIONALLY FRAUDULENTLY CONCEAL, THEREBY ACTIVELY INVOLVING THE COURTS IN AN ONGOING CONSPIRACY WITH FEDERAL AND DEFENDANTS/ACTORS, INTENTIONALLY DONE BY THE COURT(S) TO CONCEAL COMPLETE VIOLATION(S)/DEPRIVATIONS SUBSTANTIVE AND PROCEDURAL DUE PROCESS RIGHTS ENGAGED IN BY DEFENDANTS TO THE LAWSUIT IN QUESTION, NOT ONLY UPON PLAINTIFF BUT ON A VAST GROUP OF UNCONSENTING CIVILIANS DOMESTICALLY WITHIN THE UNITED STATES, VIA THE CONCEALED BCI DEW PROJECT DOMESTICALLY, IN WHICH THE COURTS ARE ACTIVE PARTICIPANTS, THE DEFENDANTS NAMED TO THE LAWSUIT THEREBY COMMANDEERING THE COURT SYSTEM TO COVERTLY IMPLEMENT/FACILIATE THE ILLEGAL/UNCONSTITUTIONAL COMPREHENSIVE BCI DEW SYSTEM WHILE USING THE COURTS TO FALSELY PUT FORTH THE IMAGE THAT A CONSTITUTIONAL FORM OF GOVERNMENT IS STILL CONTROLLING RATHER THAN THE ENTIRE SYSTEM OF GOVERNMENT WITHIN THE UNITED STATES BEING COORDINATED/CONTROLLED VIA THE COMPREHENSIVE, CONCEALED BCI DEW, IN WHICH THE SAME BCI DEW ARE USED TO (VERY LITERALLY) REMOTELY, INTERACTIVELYSTATE GOVERNMENT OF CONTROL THE MIND(S) AND BODY/IES (CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM(S)) OF PLAINTIFF AND OTHER UNCONSENTING U.S. DOMESTICALLY, THE COURTS AN INSTRUMENTAL PART OF THE CONSPIRACY TO ACTIVELY CONCEAL AND FACILIATE THE ONGOING CONCEALED USE OF SAID BCI DEW TO STAGE/FABRICATE ENTIRELY FAKE TANGIBLE EVENTS IN THE LIVES OF UNITED STATES CITIZENS/CIVILIANS, STAGING ARTIFICIAL ' REALITIES IN INDIVIDUALS ' LIVES, INCLUSIVE OF (STAGED/FABRICATED) LEGAL PROCEEDINGS IN THOSE INDIVIDUALS ' LIVES?CITIZENS/CIVILIANS THEREBY MAKING

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and lower courts improperly ruled on a case involving alleged unconstitutional use of brain-computer interface and directed energy weapons

Docket Entries

2024-11-25
Petition DENIED.
2024-11-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/22/2024.
2024-10-31
Waiver of right of respondent United States, et al. to respond filed.
2024-07-30
Application (24A108) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until September 27, 2024.
2024-07-29
2024-07-19
Application (24A108) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from July 29, 2024 to September 27, 2024, submitted to Justice Kagan.

Attorneys

Scott York
Scott York — Petitioner
United States, et al.
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Respondent